Biblical Recorder
  • HOME
  • SUBSCRIBE NOW
  • ADVERTISE
  • DONATE
  • RSS
SEARCH FOR  
Photo Gallery
News Spoke'n Tar Heel Voices Guest Columns Editorials


Classifieds About Us Other Resources
Seach The Bible
Sunday Schools Lessons

Are Southern Baptists evangelicals?

Email Print
Clock 29. December 2009 by Norman Jameson, BR Editor

I’ve heard it asked to my surprise in Sunday school, but I never dreamed I’d hear the question at a national conference from thoughtful scholars who’ve spent careers dissecting and researching Southern Baptists.

 

“Are Southern Baptists evangelicals?”

 

Of all the questions and statements presented at the conference at Union University entitled "Southern Baptists, Evangelicals and the Future of Denominationalism" that is one I did not expect.

 

Of course Southern Baptists are evangelicals.

We believe in sharing the “good news” that God loves us so much He came personally to redeem us and draw us back to Himself. Undergoing great suffering in human form He took the sin of each of us upon His shoulders, and defeated sin and death that we might live abundantly in Him.

 

We believe it is important to tell, hear and respond to that truth because salvation comes only through knowing Christ.

 

That’s what evangelicals believe, right? So we are some, right?

 

Well, yes. And maybe.

 

Nathan Finn, assistant professor of church history and Baptist studies at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, raised the question at the conference and then talked about why it jjust might be valid to ask it.

It may be legitimate to ask not because Baptists have changed our
euangelion perspective, but because now so many groups with theologies that make Southern Baptists squirm self-identify as “evangelicals” that the term may have lost its value as a descriptor for Southern Baptists.

 

As long ago as the 1970s Foy Valentine, executive director of the Southern Baptist Christian Life Commission (now defunct) called evangelicalism a “Yankee word” according to Finn, so he would not have said Southern Baptists were evangelicals.

 

Finn would distinguish between “evangelical,” commonly associated with a local church and denominational identity which affirms a high view of scripture, piety and gospel inspired activism in evangelism and missions and “evangelicalism” often associated with para-church ministries.

 

As recently as 2006, Southwestern Seminar professor Malcolm Yarnell, after evaluating two decades of Southern Baptists and evangelicals, said Southern Baptists should “maintain a separate existence from evangelicals and engage evangelicalism,” according to Finn.

 

“We are evangelicals who must at times swim against some evangelical currents nevertheless always seeking to remain in the evangelical river itself,” Finn said.

 

As “denominational evangelicals” we are focused on local churches and sometimes will be at odds against American evangelicalism, which often finds its locus in para-church organizations, Finn said. Southern Baptists for the most part would not be comfortable in the same corral with the work and purpose of some organizations which claim the identity “evangelical.”

 

While evangelical groups are doing good work in many areas such as social justice, peace, hunger and the environment, persons like Finn are concerned that the issues around which those groups rally “are becoming greater priorities than evangelism and missions,” the real root definition of “evangelical.”

 

If the next generation is to move beyond “appreciation for” to “excitement about” Southern Baptist work, Finn said, it will require an evangelical Convention with the right priorities. He suggested those priorities would include evidence of regeneration in church members; liberty of conscience under the lordship of Christ; congregational polity; freedom of each gospel community; church discipline; the Cooperative Program; “graciously confessional cooperation” that builds consensus around primary issues and zeal for Great Commission priorities.

 

Because I was encouraged toward faith – even “won” to faith – by Southern Baptist young people reaching out to me while I was in the military, I’ve always understood “reaching out” to be a part of Baptist DNA. Gospel witness is a large part of my definition of what it means to be evangelical, to “tell the good news.”

 

While anyone studying the words of our theology, doctrines, sermons and hymns would conclude Southern Baptists are evangelical, here are two reasons I’m afraid we may no longer be evangelicals in practice: the definition of evangelical has grown so broad, and we are practical universalists.

 

As Wheaton College President Duane Litfin said at the conference “the tendency to sprawl is inevitable.”

 

“The futher out you go, the less uniformity you have in the movement,” he said when explaining how the term “evangelical” has lost its meaning.

 

When anything becomes popular, others flock to it. After Hurricane Katrina, anyone in New Orleans with a pickup and a magnetic sign on its door was a contractor. No one can control the term, or limit the number of those who claim it for themselves. But everyone who calls himself or herself an “evangelical” while holding theological views distant from those in camp when the term first joined the common lexicon dilutes the definition.

 

What Litfin called an “unseemly parade of high profile evangelical scandals” and inappropriate evangelical identity with a secular political wing weakens the brand. “If we knew the truth we would understand how our being subsumed by the culture has rendered us as evangelicals ineffective,” Litfin said.

 

As evangelicals, Baptists seem to have become practical universalists because we talk about evangelism and witness and salvation and baptisms all the time but we leave few footprints in the sand behind that talk.
 
JC Bradley, missiologist and director of missions for Central Triad Baptist Association, estimates that only one percent of our churches are growing from conversion. Other growing churches are simply attracting Christians from other fellowships.

 

“Practical universalism” simply says that no matter what we say about our conviction of the need to introduce Christ to friends and neighbors so they might be saved, the fact that we don’t do it says we believe all will be saved – or we don’t care.

 

While I was surprised to hear the question, they might be right. Southern Baptists might not be evangelicals anymore.

 

Related stories

Union event examines future of denominations, SBC

Danny Akin says SBC future dependent on change

Unite around gospel essentials, Dockery urges

Al Mohler urges young Baptists to save Convention

Categories: Editorials
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments Comments (6) | RSS Post RSS

Comments

Person
Brent Hobbs
Interesting article. I especially liked this line:

"As evangelicals, Baptists seem to have become practical universalists because we talk about evangelism and witness and salvation and baptisms all the time but we leave few footprints in the sand behind that talk."

I think the disconnect between a head knowledge of the need for evangelism and a heart desire to actually DO evangelism is something that really ails our denomination and even my own life, if I were to be honest. I hope that God does a work in me and all of us to reconnect theory to practice.

posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:42 PM | Report Abuse
Person
Gene Scarborough
It appears to me that we have transitioned from "come as you are" to "come as we require you to be."

Did Jesus ever make a long list of requirements to be part of his faith movement?

Did he ever develope a BR&M statement to which one must ascribe to be a part?

posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:54 PM | Report Abuse
Person
Michael
Gene,
The answer to your questions are yes, Jesus did make a list of requirements to be part of His "faith movement." Luke 9:57-62 is one list and Luke 14:25-33 would be another. Jesus had very high standards for being His disciple and it seem like we have watered them down to such a level that anything goes in today's church. We are, in many ways the same church that Jude was warning about in Jude 3-4. We have allowed and are allowing apostates in the church so we can appear "loving" and "accepting" and in the process we are watching the death of the American Church. We need to hold to the standards that Jesus gave.

posted Tuesday, December 29, 2009 10:28 PM | Report Abuse
Person
uberVU - social comments
Trackback from uberVU - social comments

Social comments and analytics for this post

posted Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:01 AM | Report Abuse
Person
Norman
Michael,
I'm sure you didn't mean it as such, but I cringed when you said "American church."

posted Wednesday, December 30, 2009 10:05 AM | Report Abuse
Person
Gene Scarborough
Michael--

Both your cited passages have the same thing: "leave all and follow me."

If that is a "long list of requirements," then you have not read clearly. Try again!

It's certainly a far cry from BF&M 2000!

I cringe along with Norman when you say "American church." Does this mean an American flag and Christian flag at the front, apple pie and lemonade at the social hour, or just "God Bless America" on the church sign? What does it really mean to you?

posted Saturday, January 02, 2010 12:38 PM | Report Abuse

Post A Comment Post A Comment

Comments are closed
  • Archives
  • Feedback
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ/Help
  • Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2008 Biblical Recorder. All Rights Reserved.
BP Studios