|
|
||
Friday, July 25, 2003
By Tony W. Cartledge
BR Editor
A quick glance at the annual reports in almost any Baptist association's book of reports will reveal that many of our churches are clearly in decline.
I'm not sure what strategy has brought them to that point, but I think we could learn something from the example of another group of churches that are not long for this world - the Primitive Baptists.
There was a time, focused in the 1820's and 1830's, when the biggest controversy among Baptists was over the issue of missions and whether churches should form cooperative societies to support them.
Anti-missions proponents argued that the first century church had no missionary societies collecting money for evangelistic efforts, so the 19th century church shouldn't have any, either.
They shunned the missions movement, along with other ideas like teaching children in Sunday School and using musical instruments in the church, as liberalizing influences.
Today, the North Carolina landscape is dotted here and there with Primitive Baptist church buildings, but very few of them hold regular services. Most have only a tiny handful of members, virtually all of them quite elderly.
"Foot-washing" used to be a distinctive characteristic of Primitive Baptist worship, but now is rarely practiced because the few remaining members are often too disabled to carry the water and get on their knees to wash each other's feet.
Raleigh's News and Observer recently published an interview with Ethel Blalock, an earnest lady from Stem who remains a staunch supporter of the Primitive Baptist movement. It is not my desire to criticize that dear lady who clearly loves her church and its ways. But, her straightforward comments explain a lot about why those churches - and others who follow their lead - are fast fading away.
Here are some ingredients for insuring that a church has no future:
Primitive Baptists believe "the old ways" of worship practice should be an accurate reflection of the first century church. So, if they can find no evidence of innovations such as a piano or organ in the early church, they assume they don't belong in churches of any other age.
Choosing not to train up children in Sunday School and deciding not to "draw in" new members through intentional outreach activities or culturally relevant worship styles are obvious ingredients in a recipe for self-extinction.
In Blalock's words, "The preachers don't study nothing. Whatever is on his mind, and that is given by God, that's what they say. He will speak on that and he has nothing written down. I've heard them talk so fast you couldn't hardly listen that fast."
Primitive Baptists are not opposed to charitable giving, but do not believe the churches should set up organizational structures that require financial support.
"I don't think the churches closing or the numbers being down bothers the Primitive Baptists that much," Blalock said. "I don't hear them saying that anyway, because what's coming is Primitive Baptist. We know it is all fixed. It is the way God would have it."
I suspect I am not the only one who thinks that sitting on the sidelines and watching churches die (along with all the sinners they did not reach) is precisely not the way God would have it.
Most other Baptists I know would strongly disagree with the Primitive Baptist approach to belief and polity. We should ask ourselves, however, whether our actual practice suggests that we are almost as averse to change, complacent about outreach, lacking in education, unconcerned about stewardship and satisfied with the status quo as our Primitive Baptist kin.
If so, we could be well on the way down the same path to extinction, but without the comforting belief that God has predestined our demise.
Write a Tar Heel Voices letter
