Mission-sending agencies asking tough safety questions

By Ken Camp

Associated Baptist Press

DALLAS, Texas - When missionaries answer what they believe is Christ's call, a growing number also may hear echoes of the martyred German pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer who wrote 60 years ago: "When Christ calls a man, He bids him come and die."

Risk has been inherent in missions from the first century to the 21st century, observers note. But others - including some mission-sending agencies - are asking hard questions about what counting the cost of discipleship means.

"The easy spots to do missions have all been done. We're left with working in some hard spots now," said Bob Klamser, senior associate for security with the Evangelical Fellowship of Mission Agencies.

The growth of Islam and the rise of militant Muslim extremists particularly make this a more dangerous world for Christian missionaries, Klamser said.

"Missions personnel are in greater danger today than at any time in recent history," he observed.

Within one week in mid-March, four Southern Baptist humanitarian aid workers were killed and another critically wounded in a drive-by shooting in Iraq, and two Americans serving with the African Inland Mission International were shot to death in Uganda.

In the past 14 months, terrorists have killed eight Southern Baptist International Mission Board (IMB) workers, and the shooting in Iraq was the deadliest tragedy in the board's history.

"If the number of missionary deaths are increasing, it is because the world is becoming more dangerous, and missionaries are everywhere," IMB Executive Vice President Clyde Meador said.

Danger is nothing new for missionaries, IMB spokesman Mark Kelly said.

"Missions has always been a dangerous enterprise," he said. "In 1845, it was shipwrecks and malaria. Today, it's bandits and car wrecks. There simply aren't any safe places, even here in the United States. While safety is important, every missionary decides as part of obeying the missions mandate that it is better to serve God where He calls than it is to disobey and remain where it is 'safe.'"

Former IMB President Keith Parks, who went on to become coordinator of Global Missions for the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, noted the board's current position is consistent with its historic policy.

"Running risks has been a constant part of missionary history. Both missionaries and mission board staff have had the spirit of taking the gospel to the whole world, no matter where it leads, no matter what it costs," Parks said.

In addition to the "perennial threats" of "hostile governments and antagonistic religions," missionaries always have been subject to health risks and other dangers, he noted.

"No part of the world was ruled out because of danger, difficulties or hardships. Missionaries have served with courage and faith in spite of war, personal threats, stonings, burning of church houses, kidnapping, rape, imprisonment, house arrest and many other forms of danger," he said.

The board always has encouraged its workers to exercise "sanctified common sense" regarding risks, Parks said.

"Missionaries were urged not to court martyrdom. Each family had total freedom to follow the Lord's leadership in staying or leaving. Each family was to follow its own leading without judging how others were led," he said.

That's consistent with the example of the Apostle Paul in the New Testament, said Bill Tinsley, staff leader for WorldconneX, the missions network launched by the Baptist General Convention of Texas.

"There are times when Christians should seek safety as Paul did when he was lowered over the Damascus wall in a basket. But there are other times when Christians must walk into the center of the most dangerous circumstances, as Paul did when he made his final return to Jerusalem. No one should require another to risk his or her life. And we should always be prudent about the risk we incur, while being obedient to the Spirit of Christ," Tinsley said.

Parks, who served on the board that created WorldconneX, agreed. And he admitted he finds it ironic that few who ask whether missionaries should be allowed to serve in dangerous places ask the same questions about military personnel.

"Why is this true? Is it easier to justify the loss of life to protect our American way of life than in extending the kingdom of Jesus Christ? Many do not recognize we are in a spiritual war. It appears American Christians tend to use our cultural standards of safety, comfort and success rather than Jesus' high-risk, self-denial standards," he said.

The slain and injured IMB workers traveled to Iraq to assess the need for water purification and other humanitarian aid projects, not plant churches or preach.

Even so, they were Americans serving in a Muslim country occupied by United States troops.

For the IMB, those are risk-assessment factors that have to be weighed in deciding whether board-appointed personnel should serve in an area. But they are not insurmountable hurdles.

"Our approach is to focus on all the people groups of the world, and risk is a characteristic of a place, not a people group," Kelly said, noting the board is not likely to change its policy based on the incident in Iraq.

"It's not clear that anything could have been done to prevent this attack," Kelly said. "It's doubtful the attackers even knew they were Christian aid workers."

Two European humanitarian aid workers were killed in a drive-by shooting in another part of Iraq the day after the five Southern Baptists were shot.

"Every effort is made to ensure the safety of Southern Baptist workers, but there are always possibilities that you just have to leave in the hands of a sovereign God," Kelly said.

U.S. military involvement would be reason enough for the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship to keep its personnel out of a country, said Gary Baldridge, co-coordinator of Global Missions.

"We will not have anyone in places where the United States is occupying a country, mainly because it is too easy for them to be seen as agents of the U.S. government rather than who we are," Baldridge said.

In some parts of the world, the best way to strengthen a Christian witness is by supporting national groups or personnel from countries who may be more welcome than Americans, he said. The Fellowship's missions philosophy emphasizes indigenous leadership and values international partnerships, he added.

"Most of the time, we are catalysts in a cooperative effort that may involve many groups. Frankly, Americans - or Westerners in general - may not be effective in many situations in some parts of the world a lot of times these days," Baldridge said.

Mission-sending agencies face at least two hard decisions: whether to send personnel into potentially dangerous locations and when to pull them out of places when safety risks outweigh any potential benefits.

The IMB has longstanding policies in place to evaluate risks, Kelly noted.

"A strategy coordinator considering options for getting the gospel to a particular people group would factor safety issues into a decision about sending personnel to various areas where members of that people group live," he said.

The Cooperative Baptist Fellowship's administration increasingly is assuming most of the responsibility for deciding when missions personnel should pull out of unstable countries or stay away from dangerous places, Baldridge said.

The mission-sending agency's legal liability is one factor that has influenced the policy change, he noted.

The world is a more dangerous place for missionaries than it was a few decades ago, but that doesn't mean Christians should retreat from the calling to missions, Parks said.

Missions strategies should be reviewed constantly and changed when needed, but the biblical mandate for missions remains unchanged, Parks said.

"Some things are worth dying for," he said. "And obeying Jesus Christ is at the top of this list."